http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/list/1.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10178.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10178.page GMT http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10179.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10179.page GMT ]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10180.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10180.page GMT http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10181.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10181.page GMT http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10182.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10182.page GMT
That's what i thought, but i can't.]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10203.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10203.page GMT http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10204.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10204.page GMT
Let it out Larry bro, let it all out ]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10225.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10225.page GMT UFC with Goe Jogan and Spike TV in front try to hypnotize the public into believing UFC is the next great thing and will replace boxing. But if that was the truth then where's the Tysons, Alis, SRL's, Joe Louis. Wheres the Ali-Foreman, Leonard-Hearns fights ? Ali-Foreman was seen live by nearly a billion people !
If UFC had the potential to go there it would already have.
Now I predict that it will stay a niche "sport" seen by a few million skinheads and braindead bouncers. The Joe Rogans of this world.
I mean look at that guys other achievements : The man show and Fear Factor ? This is pretty much the same kind of cheap entertainment as UFC.

Their championship bouts go totally unnoticed internationally. They also suck alot !

At least boxing despite it's current pityfull boxers still get a lot of ink.
Do you see any UFC fight create the buzz that Hatton-Maywheather generates in England right now ? Or Kessler-Calzaghe in Denmark/wales ?
NO. UFC's takeover is something that purely exists in Hoe Bogans mind and on "spike tv's" newscasts.
What Roe Suckan fails to understand is that people don't care about how "realistic bla bla actual fighting blabla" something is (UFC is not even actual fighting). People are looking for something else how else do you explain the popularity of football and tennis ?

Damn Donny you got me started LOL ]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10228.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10228.page GMT ]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10268.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10268.page GMT
WELL LARRY HOMOLMES HAS A BRAIN AFTER ALL]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10276.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10276.page GMT [/quote]
Do you mean "better" as in a better fighting system or what ? What do you mean ? I expected
a better answer than this if you can call it that.

I don't think it's "better" the whole point is that it doesn't matter what is "better". If you want "better" go practice samurai, ninja, WinChun,sharpshooting, knife fighting,machine gun or whatever you can think of. These guys can kill the UFC dudes in a second. So does that spell the demise of UFC ? Why can't people understand this very very simple point ?
Why do these people automatically think that more violence = more popularity ?

Btw The UFC wussies has no right for the U anymore. FC would be enough.
]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10292.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10292.page GMT
They are the same thing, each one has it's own seperate unique apeal IMO and I think this "which is better" debate has gone on long enough and has got everyone confused.

Boxing is a part of MMA, the same goes for Wrestling, Judo, Jujitso, Kick and Thai Boxing (tons of them). They are all part of the same thing (Martial arts or what some people call sweet science, it's the same god damn thing).

I think people can't see this and I think they are stupid to try and put up a barrier between the arts on a whole. Sure some arts are more popular, they have bigger fan bases and are more in the public eye but this doesn't mean they are "better" arts.

I think money has a lot to do with this, they see the Boxers getting the big bucks and automatically think that it's a higher grade of talent. Judo guys don't earn this, why not ?? It's because it's not in the public eye and the same goes for a lot of other arts.

Boxing is in the public eye so it generates a lot of talk and money and has a huge following. UFC is in the public eye so it's also generating a lot of talk and money so automatically this debate starts about where the talent lies, it's all bullsh@t.

Or you can have the short answer: There isn't a better sport (art), it's a bullsh@t argument.]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10295.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10295.page GMT
UFC is good for boxing because boxing needs competition. Boxing has been sleepwalking ever since PPV showed its stupid face.

Because UFC is "Mixed Martial Arts" it needs boxing and the other combat sports.
UFC didnt invent much on it's own but borrowed from the others so obviously it needs "the others" to be around to refine the individual areas.

Some think that one has to go for the other to exist..but look at both they seem to co-exist fine really.
]]> http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10296.page http://localhost:8080/jforum/posts/preList/1160/10296.page GMT